Monday, August 24, 2009

Re: [Yasmin_discussions] collective genius

This debate begins to enter the mainstream. Please see this in the Guardian.
Seems UK politicians and journalists, as well as government policy makers,
are picking up on new(ish) thinking about networked and rhizomic identity.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/23/brain-society-politics

Best

Simon


Simon Biggs
Research Professor
edinburgh college of art
s.biggs@eca.ac.uk
www.eca.ac.uk
www.eca.ac.uk/circle/

simon@littlepig.org.uk
www.littlepig.org.uk
AIM/Skype: simonbiggsuk

From: Alec Robertson <alecr@dmu.ac.uk>
Reply-To: YASMIN DISCUSSIONS <yasmin_discussions@estia.media.uoa.gr>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:34:19 +0100
To: <muratgermen@sabanciuniv.edu>, YASMIN DISCUSSIONS
<yasmin_discussions@estia.media.uoa.gr>, YASMIN DISCUSSIONS
<yasmin_discussions@estia.media.uoa.gr>
Conversation: [Yasmin_discussions] collective genius
Subject: Re: [Yasmin_discussions] collective genius

Back from a holiday in sizzling Dubai, I am sorry that I missed much of the
discussion on collective genius.

My token contribution if of use now is below.

Collective genius seems part of the tensions between individualism and
collectivism evident in the field of Art&Design; the searcher vs the
re-searcher; talented anarchic individual vs trans-disciplinary team etc.
This can mirror macro political stances too eg. re-search culture in a way
mirrors communistic values, whereas the search culture of the anarchic
individual artist can mirror a contrary position.

Gathering people together to create emergence of 'genius' is not as easy as
it might seem. The notion that a individual neural network is likely to be
lesser than a network of neural networks is problematic because the
assumption is that the 'connections' are seemless. They are not. As in any
circuit, connections give rise to noise, breaks, interference etc. In a
collection of people differences in discipline terminology, attitudes etc.
can reduce a trans-disciplinary team - a network of neural networks to
merely a crowd, whereas the seemless connections within a single creative
neural network are super efficent, and perhaps more likely to give rise to
'genius'.

This topic is touched upon in a paper led by Dave Everitt (ref below) which
highlights the need for careful composition of creative collective effort.

Alec R (with factor 20 tan!)
www.4D-Dynamics.net

EVERITT, Dave., and ROBERTSON, Alec., 'Emergence and complexity,: Some
observations and reflections on trans-disciplinary research involving
performative contexts and new media' in International Journal of Performance
Arts and Digital Media. Volume 3, Issue 2&3, pp.239-252,
doi:10.1386/padm.3.2&3.281/1. Intellect Books. ISSN: 14794713

http://www.intellectbooks.co.uk/journals/view-Article,id=4964/


-----Original Message-----
From: yasmin_discussions-bounces@estia.media.uoa.gr on behalf of Murat
Germen
Sent: Tue 18/08/2009 13:39
To: YASMIN DISCUSSIONS
Subject: Re: [Yasmin_discussions] collective genius

roger,

couple of more things that somehow should matter within the realms of
collectivity and collaboration:

- collectivity does not necessarily have a physical boundary (not a
community, neighborhood, territory, etc.), does not necessarily have a
book (biblical, regulatory, constitutional, agreements of any sort in
written form, etc.), should be highly dynamic ans does not necessarily
form a clique, clan, brotherhood, fraternity, guild, society, union,
nation, civilization. this is why i love internet collectivity; the
first reason you are involved in a collective is very basic: you have
internet connection. the rest depends on your interests and your ability
to turn this into physical communication whenever possible and/or needed.

- a collective could be the "array of arrays" that are composed dynamic
definitions / coincidences / overlaps / concurrences / intersections /
convergences / etc. it is, in a way, a center of equal peripheries with
no center:) i did not know the great quote from the great marcel
duchamp, thanks for bringing it up: "... the artist is part of a larger
system in which his or her conscious intention forms a small part ..."
this is sort of what i mean by "center of equal peripheries with no center."

best,
murat

<<< +90 532 473 8970 (gsm mobile)
<<< http://www.muratgermen.com
<<< http://www.flickr.com/photos/muratgermen/
<<< http://muratgermen.wordpress.com/
<<< http://www.camgaleri.com/en/sanatci.aspx?id=27


On 17.08.2009 06:09, roger malina wrote:
> Murat
>
> I found interesting your IMECE connection and checked out the
> interesting web site for the event in turkey this october
>
> http://www.imece2009.anadolu.edu.tr/index.php?dil=en&icerik=konu
>
> "" Furthermore, it foregrounds certain concepts naturally available in
> "imece" practice such as solidarity, collaboration, experience
> sharing, common production, interaction and common use of public
> places in terms of their contribution to development of creativity. ""
>
>
> I think you make a good point about scale differences between
> collaborations , which usually involve smaller
> number of people, and collectives which can provide shared resources
> and infrastructurer for much larger
> communities of practice
>
> i just came across several interesting articles in the fall 2008 issue
> of Art Journal
> vol 67 nos: http://www.collegeart.org/artjournal/fall2008
>
> From Space to Environment: The Origins of Kankyo and the Emergence of
> Intermedia Art in Japan / Yoshimoto, Midori
>
> The Public Sensoriums of Pulsa: Cybernetic Abstraction and the
> Biopolitics of Urban Survival / McKee, Yates 46-67
>
> Steps to an Ecology of Communication: Radical Software, Dan Graham,
> and the Legacy of Gregory Bateson / Kaizen, William
>
>
> The first , by Midori Yoshimoto, about the japanese
> collective/collaboration describes the 1966 exibition involving 38
> artists who worked
> together to mount two exhibitions under the name of the Environment Society
>
> Pulsa was an american collective that exibited "unrestricted public
> experiments to redefine the urban environment ' ib boston and other
> cities in the eastern usa and their work is described in the text by
> Yates Mckee
>
> the third text ,(authored by william kaisen),includes some interesting
> discussion of the interaction of the media activist magazine radical
> software( the article discussses people such as frank gilette, paul
> ryan beryl korot,dan graham) but of relevance to our yasmin discussion
> a panel at
> the 1957 american federation of arts meeting in houston which included
> a panel with rudolf arnheim, stuart davis, marcel duchamp and
> particularly relevant gregory bateson
>
> the article quotes bateson : that he gives up any notion of man,
> redefining the self as an expanded mental
> field ...with the mind no longer bound by the invidual body..a
> conjunction of self and world produced through
> communication ecologies" which refers nicely back to the early posts
> on this YASMIN discussion
> ( even though bateson was talking 52 years ago !)
>
> and from marcel duchamp: "..the artist is part of a larger system in
> which his or her conscious intention forms
> a small part"...
>
> these discussions were of course all taking place in the same period
> as the macy cybernetics conferences
>
> a relevant comment is that art history, with its emphasis on
> individual creators/art market mechanisms= finds
> its difficult to give appropriate treatment to group and collective
> work= and as pointed out by frieder nake in
> a later issue of art journal= even in the case of E.A.T we tend to
> reemmber the names of individual artists
> (rauschenberg etc) and billy kluver of course, but the rest of the
> collective disappears in anonymity=- and
> even current artists whose work results from close and crucial
> collaboration with engineers often do not
> credit the engineers as co creators of the work.
>
> the problem with the concept of genius is that it is so tied to
> particular ways of writing art history
> that its perhaps hard to extend the concept to radical innovation
> arising from art-science or
> art-technology collaborations
>
> roger
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Murat Germen<muratgermen@sabanciuniv.edu>
> Date: Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [Yasmin_discussions] collective genius
> To: Kerry Tunstall<hvkerry@gmail.com>, YASMIN DISCUSSIONS
> <yasmin_discussions@estia.media.uoa.gr>
>
>
> let me add one more cent so that we can jump to odd and/or prime numbers:)
>
> collaboration and collectivity are not the same thing. the scale /
> number of people involved in a collaboration is usually less than what
> you would expect in a collective act. in addition, collaboration does
> not always involve a good deed;
>
> there is one notion called "imece" in the traditional turkish culture
> which generically means collective labor. below is a link that tries
> to define the notion in english:
> http://www.imece2009.anadolu.edu.tr/index.php?dil=en&icerik=index
>
> and a quotation from mehmet kucukozer's paper:
> "Another concept that promoted village solidarity was imece, or
> "community project," as Delaney defines it (152). Mainly women engaged
> in cooperatives but this depended on the project, which could take
> various forms: pooling money for cooperative construction of
> infrastructure; helping members of the village community who were in
> need (such as relatives from the city when they run out of money, or
> taking in their children during the summers); and organizing sporting
> and social events. [...] Imece indicates the emphasis placed in
> Turkish culture on maintaining the harmony of the social group,
> whether the family or its extension, the village. Jenny White's (2002)
> ethnographic work of a poor migrant district of Istanbul illustrates
> how [...] imece continued to be the basis of social networking in the
> city and provided a foundation for horizontal political organizing,
> mainly among women." (from "Civil Society: A Proposed Analytical
> Framework For Studying its Development Using Turkey as a Case Study"
> mehmet kucukozer paper, p.21, UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI MESSINA
> Facoltà di Scienze Politiche Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica,
> Matematica e Sociologia "Pareto")
> reference for Delaney: Delaney, Carol. "Traditional Modes of Authority
> and Co-operation," pp. 140-155. In Culture and Economy: Changes in
> Turkish Villages (ed. Paul Stirling). Hemingford, UK: Eothen Press,
> 1993.
> reference for white: White, Jenny B. Islamist Mobilization in Turkey:
> A Study in Vernacular Politics.Seattle,Wash.: University of Washington
> Press, 2002.
>
> i
>
> best,
> murat
>
> <<< +90 532 473 8970 (gsm mobile)
> <<< http://www.muratgermen.com
> <<< http://www.flickr.com/photos/muratgermen/
> <<< http://muratgermen.wordpress.com/
> <<< http://www.camgaleri.com/en/sanatci.aspx?id=27
>
>
>
> On 14.08.2009 23:58, Kerry Tunstall wrote:
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yasmin_discussions mailing list
> Yasmin_discussions@estia.media.uoa.gr
> http://estia.media.uoa.gr/mailman/listinfo/yasmin_discussions
>
> Yasmin URL: http://www.media.uoa.gr/yasmin
>
> HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: click on the link to the list you wish to subscribe to. In
the page that will appear ("info page"), enter e-mail address, name, and
password in the fields found further down the page.
>
> HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: on the info page, scroll all the way down and enter your
e-mail address in the last field. Enter password if asked. Click on the
unsubscribe button on the page that will appear ("options page").
>
> HOW TO ENABLE / DISABLE DIGEST MODE: in the options page, find the "Set Digest
Mode" option and set it to either on or off.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Yasmin_discussions mailing list
Yasmin_discussions@estia.media.uoa.gr
http://estia.media.uoa.gr/mailman/listinfo/yasmin_discussions

Yasmin URL: http://www.media.uoa.gr/yasmin

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: click on the link to the list you wish to subscribe to. In
the page that will appear ("info page"), enter e-mail address, name, and
password in the fields found further down the page.

HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: on the info page, scroll all the way down and enter your
e-mail address in the last field. Enter password if asked. Click on the
unsubscribe button on the page that will appear ("options page").

HOW TO ENABLE / DISABLE DIGEST MODE: in the options page, find the "Set
Digest Mode" option and set it to either on or off.

_______________________________________________
Yasmin_discussions mailing list
Yasmin_discussions@estia.media.uoa.gr
http://estia.media.uoa.gr/mailman/listinfo/yasmin_discussions

Yasmin URL: http://www.media.uoa.gr/yasmin

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: click on the link to the list you wish to subscribe to. In
the page that will appear ("info page"), enter e-mail address, name, and
password in the fields found further down the page.

HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: on the info page, scroll all the way down and enter your
e-mail address in the last field. Enter password if asked. Click on the
unsubscribe button on the page that will appear ("options page").

HOW TO ENABLE / DISABLE DIGEST MODE: in the options page, find the "Set
Digest Mode" option and set it to either on or off.


Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC009201


_______________________________________________
Yasmin_discussions mailing list
Yasmin_discussions@estia.media.uoa.gr
http://estia.media.uoa.gr/mailman/listinfo/yasmin_discussions

Yasmin URL: http://www.media.uoa.gr/yasmin

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: click on the link to the list you wish to subscribe to. In the page that will appear ("info page"), enter e-mail address, name, and password in the fields found further down the page.

HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: on the info page, scroll all the way down and enter your e-mail address in the last field. Enter password if asked. Click on the unsubscribe button on the page that will appear ("options page").

HOW TO ENABLE / DISABLE DIGEST MODE: in the options page, find the "Set Digest Mode" option and set it to either on or off.